Gradescope
Revolutionizes grading for both paper-based and digital assignments through flexible rubrics and automatic consistency across hundreds of submissions. Specialized functionality for scanning handwritten work and automatic test version separation. Per-question analytics help identify language learning objectives not yet mastered.
About Gradescope
Gradescope is an AI-powered grading and assessment platform developed by Turnitin, used by over 140,000 instructors at 2,600+ universities worldwide to streamline the grading of paper-based assignments, online submissions, and programming projects. Unlike traditional grading where instructors mark each paper individually from start to finish, Gradescope enables question-by-question grading with dynamic rubrics that can be modified mid-grading and automatically applied retroactively to all previously graded submissions. For ESL teachers in higher education and intensive English programs, Gradescope transforms writing assessment from an overwhelming time sink into a systematic, data-driven process that produces consistent feedback across dozens or hundreds of student essays. What makes Gradescope particularly valuable for ESL writing instruction is its rubric-based grading system combined with detailed analytics. Teachers create rubrics with specific criteria for grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, organization, and content development, then apply rubric items with a single click while annotating directly on student work. The platform tracks which rubric items appear most frequently across the class, revealing patterns like "75% of students lost points for article errors" or "weak thesis statements affected 60% of submissions." This data transforms grading from an isolated evaluation task into diagnostic information that directly informs lesson planning, allowing ESL teachers to address actual student weaknesses rather than assumed ones. The platform's AI-assisted grading feature (available in Institutional plans) automatically groups similar answers together, allowing teachers to grade all identical or near-identical responses simultaneously. For ESL contexts, this proves especially useful for short-answer assessments, vocabulary quizzes, and grammar exercises where multiple students make the same errors. Gradescope also supports anonymous grading to reduce bias, collaborative grading among teaching teams, and seamless LMS integration with Canvas, Blackboard, and other platforms. The combination of efficiency tools, detailed analytics, and professional-grade assessment infrastructure makes Gradescope essential for ESL programs that need to maintain rigorous writing standards while managing heavy grading loads across multiple sections.
Key Features
Use Cases for ESL Teachers
• Essay Portfolio Assessment with Consistent Rubrics: Create a comprehensive ESL writing rubric with categories for thesis clarity, paragraph organization, grammar accuracy, vocabulary sophistication, and citation formatting. Apply the same rubric across all essay types (argumentative, compare/contrast, research papers) throughout the semester, building a data trail that shows individual student growth and class-wide patterns over time. • Diagnostic Grammar Quizzes with Error Pattern Analysis: Upload scanned grammar quizzes or have students submit online, then grade question-by-question to identify which grammatical structures cause the most difficulty. Use Gradescope's statistics to discover that, for example, 80% of your B1 students struggle with present perfect vs. past simple, then design targeted mini-lessons addressing those specific gaps. • Collaborative Grading for Multi-Section Programs: In intensive English programs with multiple instructors teaching the same course, use Gradescope's collaborative grading to ensure all teachers apply identical standards. One instructor creates the rubric, the team grades together with real-time visibility into each other's work, and program administrators can verify consistency across sections. • Timed Writing Assessments with Handwritten Responses: For placement tests or timed essay exams where students write by hand, scan all responses and upload them to Gradescope. The platform handles page separation, student identification, and organizes submissions for efficient grading. Teachers annotate directly on handwritten work while applying standardized rubric criteria. • Regrade Request Management for Large Classes: When students dispute grades on writing assignments, Gradescope's built-in regrade request system creates a documented workflow. Students submit requests with specific justifications, teachers respond within the platform, and the entire exchange is logged for transparency and accountability, eliminating email chaos and ensuring fair treatment across all requests.
Pros
• Dynamic rubrics can be edited mid-grading with changes automatically applying to all previously graded papers. • Question-by-question grading keeps standards consistent and cuts grading time by 50-70%. • Statistics dashboard reveals class-wide error patterns, showing exactly what to teach next. • LMS integration and audit trails support accreditation documentation requirements.
Cons
• Full features require Institutional license - individual teachers can't purchase access independently. • Built for STEM grading patterns; language assessment features like holistic scoring require workarounds. • Paper-based assessments need scanning and uploading, adding workflow overhead.
Best For
Student Levels: B1 (Intermediate) to C2 (Proficient) learners in academic writing contexts. Most effective for upper-intermediate through advanced students producing paragraph-length or essay-length written work that benefits from detailed rubric feedback. Less suitable for beginning learners (A1-A2) where assessment focuses on discrete vocabulary or sentence-level accuracy rather than extended writing. Teaching Contexts: Higher education ESL programs, intensive English programs (IEPs), pathway programs, and community college ESL departments where teachers manage high volumes of writing assessment across multiple sections. Particularly valuable in contexts requiring standardized assessment across instructors, documentation for accreditation, or data-driven program improvement. Less essential for private tutors, small conversation classes, or contexts where informal feedback suffices. Pain Points Solved: Eliminates grading inconsistency that creeps in during marathon grading sessions. Provides concrete data to answer "what should I teach next?" rather than relying on intuition. Creates documentation trail for grade disputes, accreditation reviews, and program assessment. Enables collaborative grading calibration sessions where teaching teams develop shared standards. Reduces the Sunday-night grading dread that drives ESL teacher burnout.
Tips for ESL Teachers
• Build rubrics incrementally during your first grading session: Rather than trying to anticipate every possible error type before grading begins, start with broad categories (organization, grammar, vocabulary, content) and add specific rubric items as you encounter recurring issues. Gradescope's dynamic rubrics mean you can add "article errors" as a distinct item after noticing it appears in the first 10 papers, then apply it retroactively to papers you've already graded. This approach produces rubrics that reflect actual student errors rather than theoretical concerns. • Use the statistics dashboard to plan your next lesson immediately after grading: Before closing Gradescope after a grading session, spend five minutes reviewing the assignment statistics. Note which rubric items appeared most frequently (these become your teaching priorities) and which questions had unexpected score distributions. Screenshot or export this data to your lesson planning notes so the insights don't get lost. The connection between assessment data and instruction is Gradescope's hidden value for ESL teachers. • Create reusable rubric templates for common ESL assignment types: Build a master rubric for argumentative essays, another for summary-response papers, another for research papers. Save these as templates that can be imported into new assignments each semester. Over time, refine these rubrics based on the statistical patterns you observe, creating increasingly precise assessment tools calibrated to your specific student population's common error patterns.
Pricing
Teaching Context
Student Age
CEFR Levels
More Grading Tools
Brisk Teaching
Chrome/Edge browser extension delivering AI assistance directly into Google Docs, online textbooks, PDFs, and web content. Enables real-time support for essay grading, feedback provision, and student differentiation. Addresses teacher burnout by embedding time-saving AI into existing workflows.
FreemiumCoGrader
AI-powered rubric-based grading platform reducing essay grading time by 80% through first-pass automated feedback and grades. Features integrated ChatGPT detection to address academic integrity concerns in multilingual contexts. Enables custom grading criteria aligned with state standards.
FreemiumCriterion (ETS)
ETS's e-rater engine provides holistic scores and annotated diagnostic feedback instantly. Developed specifically for English language learners with ELL versions. Analyzes essays against 50+ language features organized into 11 categories. Multiple instructional versions available (Elementary, Middle School, High School/College, ELL, Bilingual).
Paid